Supervisory Review of Judicial Acts: Legal Representation

Senior appellate and litigation defense attorneys auditing commercial court decrees to engineer a supervisory review petition for the Supreme Court.

Supervisory Review of Judicial Acts: Legal Support and Case Management

Supervisory review proceedings constitute an extraordinary stage of high-stakes litigation, wherein the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation reviews the legality of legally binding decisions rendered by lower commercial arbitration courts to safeguard and ensure the uniformity of judicial practice.

Appealing Judicial Acts Before the Supreme Court of the RF: Drafting a Supervisory Petition

The following categories of judicial determinations are subject to formal appellate challenges before the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation:

  1. Legally binding judgments and decrees rendered by the Judicial Chamber of the Supreme Court of the RF acting as a court of first instance, provided such judgments and decrees were previously subjected to appellate review;
  2. Rulings issued by the Appellate Chamber of the Supreme Court of the RF arising from the review of appellate petitions or submissions interposed against decisions or decrees of the Judicial Chamber acting as a court of first instance;
  3. Decrees rendered by the Judicial Chamber of the Supreme Court of the RF within the framework of cassation review proceedings.

Statutory Grounds for Supervisory Review: Legal Analysis and Defense Posture

Judicial acts are subject to absolute reversal or modification if, upon reviewing the case files under supervisory procedures, the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the RF determines that the contested decision directly infringes upon:

  1. Human and civil rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution of the RF, universally recognized principles and norms of international law, or international treaties of the Russian Federation;
  2. The rights and legitimate interests of an indefinite class of persons or alternative overriding public interests;
  3. The systemic uniformity in the application and interpretation of statutory provisions across the judicial system.

Clients & Partners

65.png
68.png
69.png
73.png
75.png
fitera.jpg
imko.png
logo.png
Logo_RED_RGB_Rus.png
logo_SK_2.png